保留正文与补采附件。源页面当前未重新核验；具体限制见交付清单。

Revisit consent button We value your privacy We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalised ads or content, and analyse our traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Customise Reject All Accept All Customise Consent Preferences We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below. The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... Show more NecessaryAlways Active Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

Functional Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

Analytics Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Performance Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

Advertisement Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

Uncategorised Other uncategorised cookies are those that are being analysed and have not been classified into a category as yet. No cookies to display. Reject All Save My Preferences Accept All Toggle SearchToggle Mobile Navigation Publish AI, ML & data-science insights to a global community of data professionals. Sign inSubmit an Article LatestEditor's PicksNewsletterShipAI

Write For TDS LinkedInXToggle Search Artificial Intelligence

Courage to Learn ML: Tackling Vanishing and Exploding Gradients (Part 1)

Melting Away DNN's Gradient Challenges: A Scoop of Solutions and Insights Amy Ma February 5, 202414 min read In the last installment of the 'Courage to Learn ML' series, our learner and mentor focus on learning two essential theories of DNN training, gradient descent and backpropagation. Their journey began with a look at how gradient descent is pivotal in minimizing the loss function. Curious about the complexities of computing gradients in deep neural networks across multiple hidden layers, the learner then turned to backpropagation. By decompose the backpropagation into 3 components, the learner learned about backpropagation and its use of the chain rule to calculate gradients efficiently across these layers. During this Q&A session, the learner questioned the importance of understanding these complex processes in an era of automated advanced deep learning frameworks, such as PyTorch and Tensorflow.

This is the first post of our deep dive into Deep Learning, guided by the interactions between a learner and a mentor. To keep things digestible, I've decided to break down my DNN series into more manageable pieces. This way, I can explore each concept thoroughly without overwhelming you. Today's discussion promises to address this question by focusing on the challenge of unstable gradients, a major factor making DNN training difficult. We'll explore various strategies to address this issue, using an analogy of running a miniature ice cream factory, aptly named DNN (short for Delicious Nutritious Nibbles), to illustrate effective solutions. In subsequent posts, the mentor will talk about each solution in detail, showing how these solutions are implemented within the PyTorch framework. Learn this step by step with the interactive AI Engineer, AI and Data Scientist and Machine Learning roadmaps.

Diving into the world of DNNs, we're going to use a unique analogy that I've been fond of - envisioning DNN as an ice cream factory. Curiously, I once asked ChatGPT what 'DNN' might stand for in the realm of ice cream, and after 5 minutes of thinking, it suggested "Delicious Nutritious Nibbles." I loved it! So, I've decided to embrace this playful analogy to help demystify those daunting DNN concepts with a dash of sweetness and fun. As we delve into the depths of deep learning, imagine we're managers running a mini ice cream factory called DNN. Who knows, maybe one day, DNN ice cream will become a reality. It would be a real treat for ML/DL enthusiasts to enjoy! Let's begin this journey by learning the basic structure of using PyTorch to train a NN. Always, let's rephrase it to a fundamental question -

Can you illustrate the backpropgation and gradient descent in PyTorch?

The basic code of training a NN in PyTorch helps understand the relationship and role of gradient descent and backrpropgation. text

​import torch
​
# Define the model
model = CustomizedModel()
# Define the loss function
loss_fn = torch.nn.L1Loss()
# Define optimizer
optimizer = torch.optim.SGD(params = model.parameters(), 
                       lr = 0.01, momentum = 0.9)
​
epoches = 10
for epoch in range(epoches):
  # Step 1: Setting the Model to Training Mode:
  model.train() 

  # Step 2: Forward Pass - Making Predictions
  y_pred = model(X_train)

  # Step 3: Calculating the Loss
  loss = loss_fn(y_pred, y_train)

  # Step 4: Backpropagation - Calculating Gradients
  optimizer.zero_grad() # clears old gradients
  loss.backward() #  performs backpropagation to compute the gradients of the loss w.r.t model parameters

  # Step 5: Gradient Descent - Updating Parameters
  optimizer.step()

In this code snippet, loss.backward() is utilized to execute backpropagation. This process begins from the loss, not the optimizer, because backpropagation's purpose is to compute the gradients of the loss with respect to each parameter. Once these gradients are determined, the optimizer uses these gradients to update each parameter with a gradient descent step. The optimizer.step() method, as I view it, is appropriately named 'step' to indicate a single update of all the model parameters. This can be thought of as taking a step along the loss surface during the optimization process.

For a better understanding of what "a step along the loss surface" means, I strongly suggest reading my post on gradient descent. In it, I use a video game analogy to vividly demonstrate how we navigate the loss surface. Also, you will love the title picture draw by ChatGPT.

Can you explain the concepts of vanishing and exploding gradients in neural networks? What are the primary causes of these issues?

Computing gradients in a deep neural network (DNN) is complex, primarily due to the extensive number of parameters spread across many hidden layers. Backpropagation simplified this calculation by computing the gradient of the loss regard to each parameter, applying the chain rule. This process, due to the chain rule, involves derivatives calculated through successive multiplications , where values can drastically change. It results gradients that might become extremely small or large as we move to the lower layers (layers that are close to the input layer). It's akin to tracing back through a series of intricate water filters to enhance water quality, layer by layer. The early layers' influence is hard to evaluate as it gets altered by subsequent layers. Such unstable gradients introduce significant challenges when training deep neural networks, leading to the phenomena known as "vanishing" (extremely small gradients) and "exploding" (excessively large gradients) gradient problems. This instability makes DNN training challenging and restricts the architecture to fewer layers. In other words, without addressing this issue, DNNs cannot achieve the desired depth.

If you wonder about why backpropagation involves successive multiplications, I suggest checking out my earlier article on backpropagation. In the post, I explained the calculations by breaking it down into 3 components and use code examples to make it easier to understand. I also explored why researchers generally favor deeper and narrower DNNs over wider and shallower ones.

I get that vanishing gradients can be an issue because the lower layers' parameters barely update, making learning difficult with such small gradients. But why are exploding gradients problematic too? Wouldn't they provide substantial updates for the later layers?

You're correct in noting that large gradients can lead to significant updates in parameters. However, this isn't always the case and large update is not always beneficial. Let me explain why exploding gradients prevent effective training in deep neural networks:

  1. Exploding gradients doesn't always means large updates, it can results in numerical instability and overflow. Exploding gradients don't always lead to large, meaningful updates. When training with computers, excessively large gradients can cause numerical overflow. For example, consider a network where the gradient at a certain layer is 10⁷, a large but feasible number. During backpropagation, this value, multiplied by other large values due to the chain rule, can exceed the limits of standard floating-point representation, resulting in overflow and the gradients becoming NaN (presents Not a Number). When updating parameters using parameter = parameter - learning_rate * gradient, if the gradient is NaN, the parameters also become NaN. This corrupts the forward pass of the network, making it incapable of generate useful predictions.
  2. Large updates aren't always beneficial. Large gradient values can lead to dramatic changes in parameters, causing oscillations and instability in the parameter updates. This can result in longer training times, difficulty in converging, and the potential to overshoot the global minimal of the loss function. Coupled with a relatively larger learning rate, these oscillations can significantly slow down the training process.
  3. Large gradients aren't necessarily informative. It's a misunderstanding that larger gradients are always more informative and lead to meaningful updates. In fact, if gradients become excessively large, they can overshadow the contributions of smaller, yet more meaningful, gradients. Imagine navigating the loss landscape, where large gradients, often influenced by outliers or noise, can misguide us in choosing our next step. Additionally, large gradients may benefit some layers but not others, resulting in imbalanced learning. For instance, large gradients in upper layers might lead to extreme small derivatives in layers using sigmoid activation functions. This can result in an imbalanced learning process within the network.

Why is it that the oscillation in weight updates caused by exploding gradients turns out to be harmful? I understand that Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) with small batch sizes also leads to oscillation, but why doesn't that cause similar issues?

You're right in noting that Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) with small batch sizes introduces some instability in the weight updates. However, this type of oscillation is both controllable and relatively minor, primarily because it originates from the data itself. Utilizing a small subset of training data typically won't deviate too far from the behavior of the full dataset, meaning the noise is manageable. Additionally, this manageable level of noise can enhance the model's generalizability by improving its insensitivity to minor data variations. Essentially, while navigating the loss surface, SGD might make decisions that slightly deviate from the most optimal path to the global minimum. However, these suboptimal steps aren't drastically far from the ideal ones. This approach reduces the likelihood of getting stuck in plateaus and saddle points, enabling movement away from these areas towards potentially better local minima or even the global minimum in the complex landscape of DNN. On the other hand, the oscillation caused by exploding gradients is of a different behavior. Due to exploding gradients, we might make substantially large updates to parameters, leading to significant movements on the loss surface. These updates can be so large that they catapult the model to a position quite distant from where it was initially, or even farther from the global minimum. Unlike with SGD, where the steps are small and keep us close to our original position, exploding gradients can negate our previous progress, forcing us to redo all the hard work to find the global minimum. To visualize it, think of it like playing an RPG video game, where we use magic (akin to an optimizer) to guide our movements towards the treasure located at the lowest point of the map. With the magic of SGD, we might stray from the best route, but we generally head towards the treasure. Thus, moving fast enough, we'll likely reach and get the treasure. But with exploding gradients, it's like being thrown randomly to a new, unfamiliar place on the map, requiring us to restart our exploration. In the worst-case scenario, we might end up at the farthest point from the treasure, making it nearly impossible to reach our goal with limited time and computational sources.

So how do we know whether a gradient is too large or too small? How'd we detect those problems?

Detecting unstable gradients is important for ensuring the effective learning of different layers at a consistent pace. If you suspect your model is suffering exploding or vanishing gradients, consider those methods to effective identify those problems:

For practical implementation, TensorBoard stands out as a popular tool for visualizing training progress. It supports both TensorFlow and PyTorch and allows for detailed tracking of losses, gradients and more. It can be a great tool to identify gradient-related issues.

Are you suggesting that, in DNNs, we aim for all layers to learn at an same pace?

We don't actually expect every layer in a DNN to learn at the same rate. Our goal is to have a consistent and balanced weight update across the entire network. Vanishing gradients, for instance, pose a problem because they lead to the upper layers (those closer to the output) learning more quickly and converging earlier due to larger gradients, while the lower layers (those closer to the input) lag behind with almost random weight adjustments due to small gradients. This can result in the network converging to a less-than-ideal local minimum, with only the upper layers properly trained and the lower layers nearly unchanged. In general, we want make sure each layer's updating rate align with its impact on the final model prediction. The problem with both vanishing and exploding gradients is that they break this balance, and unstable gradients cause layers get updated disproportionately. It's similar to trying to walk left by only turning your body without moving your feet, you won't get very far. The objective, then, is to achieve stable and uniform weight updates across the network throughout the network. This is where adaptive learning rate optimizers come into play, offering significant benefits. They dynamically adjust the learning rate based on historical gradients, aiding in more efficient loss reduction. Practically, frameworks like PyTorch and TensorFlow allow for the specification of different learning rates for each layer. This capability is particularly beneficial when fine-tuning pretrained models or during transfer learning. It allows customized learning rate adjustments per layer to suit specific requirements. Here are some useful discussion on Stack Overflow and PyTorch forums.

How do we generally address the issue of unstable gradients when training DNNs?

Imagine our DNN model as a mini-ice cream factory, where ingredients flow through various departments to produce ice cream that's then rated by customers at the end of the production line. Each department in this mini-factory represents a layer in the DNN, and the customer feedback on the ice cream's taste represents the loss gradient used to improve the recipe through backpropagation. However, our factory faces a challenge: the customers feedback isn't being effectively communicated back through the departments. Some departments overreact to the feedback, making drastic changes (akin to exploding gradients), while others overlooked, barely making any adjustments (akin to vanishing gradients). As the factory managers, our goal is to ensure that feedback is processed appropriately at each stage to consistently produce ice cream that delights our customers. Here are the strategies we can employ:

Next time, I'll cover the topic of activation functions and weight initialization methods in detail. Rather than simply running through the formulas and listing their pros and cons, I plan to share the essential questions that have shaped my understanding - questions that frequently go unasked but are vital for grasping why each method and function is shaped the way it is. These discussions might even empower us to innovate our own functions and weight initialization methods. For those keen to journey with me through this series, feel free to follow along. Your engagement - through claps, comments, and follows - fuels this endeavor. It's not just encouragement; it's the very heartbeat of this educational series. As I continue to refine my grasp on these topics, I often revisit and update my past posts, enriching them with new insights. So, stay tuned for more! (Unless otherwise noted, all images are by the author)

Other posts in this series:

If you liked the article, you can find me on LinkedIn .

Register Now to Continue Reading

Unlock Towards Data Science with a Free Account

All articles on Towards Data Science are available to registered users. Create a free account today to access this article and thousands more. Register for freeSign in to your account

Written By

Amy Ma

See all from Amy Ma Deep DivesArtificial IntelligenceCourage To Learn MlData ScienceMachine Learning Share This Article

Towards Data Science is a community publication. Submit your insights to reach our global audience and earn through the TDS Author Payment Program. Write for TDS

Related Articles

Early Detecting Credit Card Frauds

Machine Learning Applying a Machine Learning model to actively test and classify transactions as valid or not Thales Meier January 5, 20227 min read

Data Science, Meaning and Diversity

Feminism Data in data science are abstracted for analysis. This raises a problem if they become disconnected from reality. Could diversity help? Ismael Kherroubi Garcia April 10, 202116 min read

Simple Customer Segmentation Using RFM Analysis

Data Science A simple way to segment your customer profile Chi Nguyen March 2, 20214 min read

The Hopfield network

Artificial Intelligence A C++ implementation Filippo Valle February 9, 20216 min read

Unsupervised Keyphrase Extraction with PatternRank

NLP Using pretrained transformer language models and part of speech for state-of-the-art keyphrase extraction Tim Schopf October 19, 20226 min read

Create and publish your own Python package

Programming A short and simple guide on how to pip install your custom made package Mike Huls July 18, 20215 min read

Why and How to Adjust P-values in Multiple Hypothesis Testing

Data Science P-values below a certain threshold are often used as a method to select relevant features. Advice below suggests how to use them correctly. Igor Šegota May 5, 20239 min read

DeiT Paper Walkthrough: Vision Transformer on a Budget

Artificial Intelligence Understanding how DeiT works via knowledge distillation —and how to implement it with PyTorch Muhammad Ardi Putra June 2, 202520 min read

How to Easily Cluster Textual Data in Python

Artificial Intelligence With this method, you'll never have to manually cluster survey answers ever again James Asher December 1, 20215 min read

Your home for data science and AI. The world's leading publication for data science, data analytics, data engineering, machine learning, and artificial intelligence professionals. Subscribe to Our NewsletterWrite For TDS•About•Advertise•Privacy Policy•Terms of Use © Insight Media Group, LLC 2026•The New Stack•roadmap.sh•Creator Network

Recommended Articles

Close