保留正文与补采附件。源页面当前未重新核验;具体限制见交付清单。

Revisit consent button We value your privacy We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalised ads or content, and analyse our traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Customise Reject All Accept All Customise Consent Preferences We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below. The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... Show more NecessaryAlways Active Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

Functional Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

Analytics Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Performance Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

Advertisement Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

Uncategorised Other uncategorised cookies are those that are being analysed and have not been classified into a category as yet. No cookies to display. Reject All Save My Preferences Accept All Toggle SearchToggle Mobile Navigation Publish AI, ML & data-science insights to a global community of data professionals. Sign inSubmit an Article LatestEditor's PicksNewsletterShipAI


Write For TDS LinkedInXToggle Search Artificial Intelligence

Common Causes of Data Leakage and how to Spot Them

Let's learn how to identify and deal with the common causes of data leakage in ML models Ivo Bernardo May 17, 20248 min read Image by realaxer @Unsplash.com Image by realaxer @Unsplash.com One of a Data Scientist's worst nightmares is data leakage. And why is data leakage so harmful? Because the ways your models may suffer from it are designed to convince you that your model is excellent and that you should be expecting awesome results in the future. As you may know, the primary goal of every machine learning model is to generalize the patterns it learns for the future data. As we can't really access future data (without making a time machine first), the best way to simulate this during model development is to set aside a test and a validation set to be used to assess model performance. During development, data scientists aim to improve the model's test and validation performance. If results are satisfactory, then data scientists assume that their models are ready for production. And that's why data leakage is so dangerous. As it's able to hide itself in seemingly innocent behaviors, it can lurk in the background, waiting for you to put that model into production and just find out that the performance in real life is way worse than the one on the test set. Normally, data leakage involves the process of polluting our train set with things that will end up violating one or more parameters of "future dataset" rule. And it's one of the most major causes of unsuccessful model deployments. Learn this step by step with the interactive AI Engineer, AI and Data Scientist and Machine Learning roadmaps. In this blog post, we'll discuss some of the most common data leakage sources and some tips on how to spot them! Let's dive in!


Feature Leakage

Probably the most famous data leakage source (and the easiest to spot, as well). Feature leakage happens when we have features that are directly related to the target often being a result of the target event. Normally, feature leakage happens because the feature value is updated in a point in time after the target event. Let's see some examples:

*days after the last contract of the customer with a specific company finished (for example, in a telco business). If the customer does not renew, this is, indeed, the churn event. These three examples also show different levels of feature leakage. For example, in 1) and 3), there is a direct correlation between target and features and it's very likely that 100% of the target will have these variables as non-null values. However, 2) is harder to spot, because other patients may have gone through the diagnostic test and didn't have the disease making this leakage source less obvious. One way to spot feature leakage is via feature importance data obtained in different models. For me, what works very well is fitting an extremely shallow decision tree and checking if one of the features has an enormous difference, in terms of importance, compared to others. When I find that a feature is overly indexed, those features are normally related to leakage problems. To solve these problems, it's recommended that you look into how these features that have leakage were generated so that you can:


Time Correlated Data using Random-Test Split

Funny story - I've learned this the hard way. In the past, I've developed machine learning models to predict soccer games' results and ended up having a betting system that was completely flawed. Probably you've felt something along these lines before - have you ever trained a time-series model and had spectacular results on the test set? That's quite common when you perform a random train-test split on your dataset when rows have a time-dependence. Even if you are not training a time series model, but your rows are time-dependent, you should always perform a continuous train-test split based on time and not a random train-test split. Time-dependent data is a tricky thing to model, particularly because covariates and data distribution shifts as time goes by. If you hint any portion of the new distributions to the train set, your model will be flawed. The recommendation for time-dependent data is to perform assessments on a continuous cross-validation (CV) mechanism, similar to the one below: Appropriate Train and Test for Time-Dependent Data - Image by Author Appropriate Train and Test for Time-Dependent Data - Image by Author So, yeah.. never use random train-test split on time-dependent data!


Hinting Something to the Test Set via Scaling and Preprocessing

This is a trickier one has even sometimes even experienced data scientists end up falling for it. When performing outlier analysis, scaling, missing value imputation, always make sure that you perform those analysis on the train set and after train-test splitting. Sometimes people confuse this sentence with applying the same transformations to the test set - while that is completely true (your test set needs to mimic your training set's scale and not contain missing values), you shouldn't give any hint of the distribution of the test set to the train one. For example, imagine you are applying a Standard Scaler (that uses a Z-Score with mean and standard deviation). You want this standard scaler to memorize the average and standard deviation of the train set. After that set you will apply the same scaler with the fixed statistics from the training set to the test set. Take another famous preprocessing step: removing outliers. Does it make sense to remove outliers from the test set? Well, if you know what will be an outlier in the future (remember that test sets are just really poor simulations of a future dataset where the model will be used on) then tell me please, because you have just invented a time machine! As it's not possible to remove outliers in the future (of course, you can remove obvious outliers from being scored by your model) , you generally lack information about what a "future" outlier will look like. If you do remove outliers in the test set, you should expect a larger drift between the test set performance and real world deployment. To avoid this type of leakage, perform train-test split before you do anything on the data. A Data Scientist finding out their model is wrong in Production - Image by AI generated by Microsoft Design A Data Scientist finding out their model is wrong in Production - Image by AI generated by Microsoft Design


Leakage from Data Generation and Sources

This one is trickier to spot. Feature leakage from data generation and/or data sources is normally tied with how data is collected. You probably won't have full control of it as a data scientist. Let's take the customer default example that we pointed out in the Feature Leakage - imagine you are building a predictive model that wants to find out if a customer will default in the next installment and you find out that the number of outbound calls to the customer is a great feature to predict this. You speak with people who are actively doing these phone calls and you find out that the process is fair. They actually call riskier customers and it may make sense that you include this feature in the model. But, after sitting down with them, you find out that there are certain calls that happen after they are certain that the customer will default. What happens is that your IT systems only log defaults one day after they actually happened so some of these calls are actually calls to ask customer why they defaulted. If you use this feature (call is done on day x , default is logged on day x +1), you'll actually be adding leakage to your model's prediction as a feature is leaking information into the target. This is the hardest leakage to spot as it requires that you deeply know how your features were generated and good data governance models. Nevertheless, using the technique we spoke about in the Feature Leakage section can be a quick and raw way to understand if you have obvious leakage from the generation and sourcing of your data.


Feature Engineering

Another common way to generate data leakage is during the feature engineering process. Although this is just a subset of Feature Leakage, it's so common that I needed to point it out. One common example is when creating moving averages in time-series. Often, people may confuse time intervals and add periods that you are supposed to predict on the average value. When overlooked, this will create an enormous distortion on the time series model. Another example is when using features that were themselves generated by other machine learning models. Using these features is always risky as these models have uncertainty (and may have leakage) inside them. Building these features based on other models can have a high impact and "seemingly" create a much better model that loses its generalization power.

Conclusion

And that's it! These are the most common data leakage problems that I've found in my career as a data scientist. In a nutshell, data leakage is the silent killer of machine learning models. It's designed to make you feel that you have a great model but whose performance is highly influenced by leakage problems. Data leakage issues can be so bad that they can impact your model as soon as you get it into production. Identifying leakage as soon as possible will not only make your model more stable but also more accurate in the real world. Do you know any other data leakage causes that I didn't mention here? Point them out in the comments! Also, feel free to check me out on my Youtube Channel: You can subscribe to my channel "The Data Journey" here. Or my Udemy page here.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Unlock Towards Data Science with a Free Account

All articles on Towards Data Science are available to registered users. Create a free account today to access this article and thousands more. Register for freeSign in to your account


Written By

Ivo Bernardo

See all from Ivo Bernardo Artificial IntelligenceData LeakageData ScienceMachine LearningMlops Share This Article

Towards Data Science is a community publication. Submit your insights to reach our global audience and earn through the TDS Author Payment Program. Write for TDS

Related Articles

I’ve Done 80+ Data Science Interviews – Here’s What Works

Data Science 3 years of data science interview experience Egor Howell December 24, 20246 min read

Rethinking Data Science Interviews in the Age of AI

Data Science How AI is transforming data science interviews—and what hiring managers and candidates should do to adapt Yu Dong July 4, 202510 min read

I'm a Self-Taught Data Scientist. Here Are My 3 Suggestions for Newcomers

Machine Learning Make your learning journey more efficient. Soner Yıldırım April 13, 20225 min read

Don't Miss Out on Pub/Sub

Programming A high-level overview of the Pub/Sub pattern and why you should be incorporating it into your projects. Andrew Didinchuk February 15, 20213 min read

Understanding Morphological Image Processing and Its Operations

Artificial Intelligence This article illustrates Morphological Image Processing in more straightforward terms; readers can understand how Morphology works in... Prateek Chhikara March 30, 20225 min read

Kickstart Your Data Science Journey - A Guide for Aspiring Data Scientists

Artificial Intelligence Key Technical Skills You Need to Kick-start Your Career in Data Science Saankhya Mondal November 6, 202416 min read

Data Science for the Heart

Artificial Intelligence Cardiovascular Disease Data Analysis and Predictive Modeling Suleman Bazai May 17, 202112 min read

Why Do You Need to Use SQL Grouping Sets for Aggregating Data?

Machine Learning Efficiency, readability, and scalability Soner Yıldırım April 20, 20233 min read

Artificial Intelligence is Transforming Modern Education

Artificial Intelligence A commentary piece on how AI is being used in today's classrooms as well as discussion on the path forward. Sanjay Adhikesaven September 11, 202210 min read

Your home for data science and AI. The world's leading publication for data science, data analytics, data engineering, machine learning, and artificial intelligence professionals. Subscribe to Our NewsletterWrite For TDS•About•Advertise•Privacy Policy•Terms of Use © Insight Media Group, LLC 2026•The New Stack•roadmap.sh•Creator Network

Recommended Articles

Close